The Montana Fish and Wildlife Commission voted Wednesday to set a wolf harvest limit of 300 animals for the upcoming season, pulling back significantly from last year’s take after a revised population estimate found roughly 370 fewer wolves in the state than officials had previously believed.
The new estimate places Montana’s wolf population at approximately 725 animals. State biologists recommended an even more conservative cap of 250 wolves, but commissioners settled on 300 — a substantial reduction from the 458 wolves harvested in the prior season.
A Revised Count Drives New Limits
The downward revision to Montana’s wolf population estimate was the central factor behind the commission’s decision. With the count coming in hundreds of animals lower than expected, both harvest quotas and individual bag limits were tightened across the state’s management regions.
Regional quotas approved by the commission break down as follows: 131 wolves in Region 1, 92 in Region 2, 33 in Region 3, and 28 in Region 4. The statewide individual bag limit was reduced from 15 wolves to 10, with Region 3 carrying a stricter cap of just 5 per hunter or trapper. In wolf management units adjacent to Yellowstone National Park, only one wolf may be taken per unit.
Commissioner Ian Wargo described the commission’s goal as striking a balance, saying the approved limit was intended to “prevent a runaway harvest year while also not putting an additional layer of handcuffs on us,” as he told the Montana Free Press.
Background: Delisting, Legislative Pressure, and the Management Mandate
Montana has managed wolves as a game species since they were removed from the federal endangered species list in 2011. Since then, the state legislature has directed wildlife managers to reduce wolf numbers, though no specific population target has been set by statute — leaving the commission with significant discretion over how aggressively to pursue that mandate each year.
That discretion has drawn scrutiny from multiple directions. Livestock producers and hunting groups have long pressed for aggressive population control, pointing to predation losses and competition with big-game herds. Wildlife advocates have argued the opposite, contending that annual harvest totals have been excessive.
KC York of Trap Free Montana, a group that opposes lethal wolf management, criticized the commission’s 300-wolf approval as insufficient reform, telling the Montana Free Press that “the motive remains to kill as many wolves as possible.” The commission’s decision to approve a limit 50 wolves above the biologists’ recommendation gave critics on that side an opening.
Season Opens September 15
The general wolf hunting and trapping season is scheduled to begin September 15. With quotas now set at the regional level, season closures in individual regions can occur independently as limits are reached — a structure designed to prevent any single area from bearing a disproportionate share of the harvest.
The Yellowstone-adjacent management unit restrictions are particularly notable given the high-profile nature of wolf packs that range across the park boundary. Single-wolf limits in those units reflect the sensitivity of harvest pressure near a region where wolves are closely monitored and carry significant public attention.
Broader Wildlife Management Context
The commission’s action comes as Montana navigates several intersecting natural resource policy debates. Federal land management decisions — including a proposed rollback of the Roadless Rule that protects a significant share of Montana’s national forests — could eventually affect wolf habitat and movement corridors, though that question was not directly before the commission Wednesday.
For ranchers and rural communities, the wolf population remains a live concern alongside other livestock pressures. Montana cattle producers have already expressed skepticism about federal policies they see as inadequate to address herd challenges, and wolf predation continues to surface in those conversations.
The commission will monitor harvest progress throughout the season and retains authority to adjust regional closures as quotas are approached. With the revised population estimate in hand, wildlife managers will also be watching closely to see whether the lower count reflects a genuine population shift or a methodological adjustment — a question that could shape how the commission approaches harvest targets in future seasons.


